<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Loo.me - Latest Comments</title><link>http://sideways8.disqus.com/</link><description>Thoughts on technology, movies and other items in Mike Lewis's life</description><atom:link href="https://sideways8.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:09:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Steve Jobs is Shocking in his Biography</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/11/steve-jobs-shocking-biography/#comment-357606004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the book implies that a lot of his emotional troubles stem from his adoption.  There are quite a few quotes from his friends saying, "it's like he had a hole missing and he was on a quest to find it".  This was given as an explanation as to why he adopted such a counter-culture stance and why he went to india for 9 months and just bummed around.  It seems like it was a huge issue for him. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikePLewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:09:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Steve Jobs is Shocking in his Biography</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/11/steve-jobs-shocking-biography/#comment-357595391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was wondering about that. You read a lot about how he was so innovative, etc. but there weren't so many people coming out talking about how he was just an all around great guy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kita</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:54:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Biggest and Baddest Pig Ever</title><link>http://loo.me/2007/05/the-biggest-and-baddest-pig-ever/#comment-336002903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;omg that is a big pig nice shot&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Albmushroom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 10:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My thoughts on Steve Jobs | Loo.me</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/10/my-thoughts-on-steve-jobs/#comment-329929836</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I enjoyed reading your piece Mike. I thought of you often since Steve's passing. Strangely, I was (in a way) waiting for an expression of love, loss and inspiration from you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelly Fraser</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:26:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 50/50 is the best movie of the year (so far)</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/10/5050-movie-year/#comment-329702788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jules only does doublers. God bless the cineplex.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Willis Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:45:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 50/50 is the best movie of the year (so far)</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/10/5050-movie-year/#comment-329029380</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Skeletor stole the show indeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abigail Kesner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:39:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 US soccer players</title><link>http://loo.me/2007/10/top-10-us-soccer-players/#comment-325243520</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Agreed. Obviously the writer had some issues with Donovan's stint at Leverkusen and Bayern. Those in the know realize he was in a no-win situation at both places. Want to critique his European play? Ask anyone at Everton.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 18:42:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 8 Ways Pirates of Carribean steals from Return of the Jedi</title><link>http://loo.me/2006/08/8-ways-pirates-of-carribean-steals-from-return-of-the-jedi/#comment-322436416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Pirates﻿ of the Caribbean 1-3 were all AWESOME, but I have to say that On stranger tides was truly the best so far for me. I really loved it alot and I can't wait till it comes out on DVD! I'm so exited!! :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">david</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 01:03:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why the Miami Vice TV Show is Cooler Than the Movie</title><link>http://loo.me/2006/07/why-the-miami-vice-tv-show-is-cooler-than-the-movie/#comment-318849176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. A friend of mine who apparently didn't like the show and/or Don Johnson claimed that the movie was good because "It's not a Don Johnson thing. It had a storyline." To each his own, but I always thought, I dunno about that. A lot of ppl hated the movie because they didn't realize it had a storyline. My hometown paper called it plotless. Anyhow, the show had a bit of humor and character, and Michael Mann has claimed the movie didn't need character development because Crockett and Tubbs are already well-known. That threw me for a loop b/c I buy into remakes and reimaginings being different from the original.  As for movie Crockett, they never said he was a Southerner, but I guess he was b/c we all know TV Crockett was.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 04:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Freeway: A Reese Witherspoon and Keifer Sutherland Whacked-out Movie</title><link>http://loo.me/2007/03/freeway-a-reese-witherspoon-and-keifer-sutherland-whacked-out-movie/#comment-301981679</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just watched it.. It was great lol. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Essebeach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 20:02:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Still Believe in Patch</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/08/i-still-believe-in-patch/#comment-293988393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The answer was never difficult: Hire less MBA's and more creative people with vision, AND provide them with the ability to EXECUTE on good ideas they produce.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike22</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:05:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Deck: A Fascinating Ad Platform</title><link>http://loo.me/2010/03/the-deck/#comment-293870942</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point, but the number of advertisers is the very "volatile" number here. Put that, for one month (maybe during summer when there's less traffic) they don't top with 15-20 advertisers but instead they fill only 5-8 slots. There will be less payout for the network, how can they manage it? The publishers will be given the same amount, or they earn corresponding to that month income? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Deck: A Fascinating Ad Platform</title><link>http://loo.me/2010/03/the-deck/#comment-293780039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good question.  From the sites they are getting, it does seem that people find it a good alternative. So it must pay well.  I'd be curious to hear what you find out about it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikePLewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:39:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Deck: A Fascinating Ad Platform</title><link>http://loo.me/2010/03/the-deck/#comment-293779463</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think so.  I think they just keep it at $1500.  Similarly, if you go under during a month, they eat the lack of impressions.  The key to their model is that both the sites and the advertiser understand that they are no longer operating on a CPM basis anymore.  The traffic of a site sets the initial price, but it doesn't govern how much is paid or impressions. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikePLewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Deck: A Fascinating Ad Platform</title><link>http://loo.me/2010/03/the-deck/#comment-293575152</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And, as they have fixed rates (e.g. 1500$ for one month), how can they manage an excess of CPM? Put they sell a month for 10M impressions, and that month the network do 15M, they have to payout to the publishers the extra 5M impressions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:38:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Deck: A Fascinating Ad Platform</title><link>http://loo.me/2010/03/the-deck/#comment-293573295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious about how much these networks pays out to publishers. Are revenues CPM based? The Deck is high priced so they can easily have good payouts, but what about smaller networks like Carbon or Fusion? With $1500 (or less) per ad for 15-20 advertisers and 50 sites in the network...just do the math! Even if they split equally 100% is like 600$ per publisher, is that worth being the one and only ad on your website?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Bad Texas Gator</title><link>http://loo.me/2006/09/biggator/#comment-284355823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If that's a 23 ft gator that deer must be a horse. Not even close to 23 ft. Still, 13-14 ft is monster enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">A0307090807</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:50:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Foursquare vs. Quora: which would you invest in?</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/05/foursquare-vs-quora-which-would-you-invest-in/#comment-276240698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's an update: Foursquare users are checking in 3 million times per day now, up from 2 million in February. Out of 10 million users that’s a very impressive number. (&lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/foursquare-dennis-crowley-interview-2011-8" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/foursquare-dennis-crowley-interview-2011-8"&gt;Business Insider&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikePLewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:01:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Turntable is Kicking Ass</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/07/why-turntable-is-kicking-ass/#comment-260250535</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's a funky licensing model mixing Soundexchange with on-demand but if they can get the sponsorship model right it should work. sticky experience. motivated to be in the room and on the page.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mosjef</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:56:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Turntable is Kicking Ass</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/07/why-turntable-is-kicking-ass/#comment-251131923</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree with the fact that Grooveshark is doing well.  They both have users.  It's not the users that are the problem.  Give anyone free music and you'll get users.  It's the fact that the business isn't crushing it.   Turntable is the same business model as Pandora but without the advertising built yet, they are just bleeding cash at the moment.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikePLewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:42:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Turntable is Kicking Ass</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/07/why-turntable-is-kicking-ass/#comment-250861292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;pandora, spotify and grooveshark are all doing well though.  i think this is actually a good time to be in music tech because there will have to be a solution.  music isn't going away yet.  and no one has totally figured it out yet...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iamnader</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Business Org Charts (Apple, Microsoft and others)</title><link>http://loo.me/2011/06/business-org-charts-apple-microsoft-and-others/#comment-247453943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there, this drawing was taken from&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;    &lt;a href="http://www.bonkersworld.net/2011/06/27/organizational-charts/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bonkersworld.net/2011/06/27/organizational-charts/"&gt;http://www.bonkersworld.net...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Could you add the original link to your post? Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Manu Cornet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:07:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 US soccer players</title><link>http://loo.me/2007/10/top-10-us-soccer-players/#comment-240275930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#1 should be Landon Donovan and Clint Dempsey #2.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maxsports</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:27:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 US soccer players</title><link>http://loo.me/2007/10/top-10-us-soccer-players/#comment-238365258</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mia Hamm is very good she should be #1&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mickeymoo123456</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:30:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Big Bad Texas Gator</title><link>http://loo.me/2006/09/biggator/#comment-236062547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;big ass mofo&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jimenezvansofthewalljose</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>